Top 13 religious movies for Lent

22 02 2012

By Tom Quiner

I’m just back from a beautiful Ash Wednesday service.

I am always overwhelmed by the realization that I came from dust and will return to dust.

I am overwhelmed that God can breathe life into that dust to make me and you.

And I am overwhelmed that even after I die, I will enjoy eternal life made possible by Christ’s sacrifice on the cross.

Lent has begun. I particularly enjoy watching faith-based movies over the next six weeks. There are some I come back to time and time again. There are others I don’t come back to, and yet they had such a profound impact on me that I still recommend them.

Here are my top 13 religious movies to watch this Lent. Why thirteen? Because 13 is a lucky number for Christians, since it represents the Holy Trinity, one God in three forms.

#13: SHOES of the FISHERMAN. A great story by Morris West of an unlikely Pope. Great performance by Anthony Quinn as the new Pope faced with a world in crisis. Also stars Sir Lawrence Olivier. (For a great read, Morris West wrote a little know book called “The Clowns of God” about another fictional Pope who has an apocalyptic vision of the coming end of the world. This is the most creative pro life story I have ever read.)

#12: A MAN for ALL SEASONS. The story of Sir Thomas More who refuses to compromise his faith by sanctioning King Henry VIII’s divorce, even though it will cost him his life. Very relevant in light of the Obama Mandate that demands that modern day Catholics compromise their faith or be fined, bankrupted, or jailed. Very relevant in light of Catholic bishops saying they will go to jail rather than honor this presidential edict. This 1966 film won six Academy Awards including best actor for Paul Scofield who played More. This film also featured Robert Shaw, Orson Wells, and Susannah York. It was based on a play by Robert Bolt.

#11: THE MISSION. This film was also written by Robert Bolt. It follows the lives of 18th century Jesuit missionaries in South America. Jeremy Irons and Robert Deniro turn in riveting performances as two very different priests. Their relationship is beautiful and complex. Ennio Morricone wrote one of the great musical scores of all time. The theme song all by itself is enough to make a doubter believe in God.

# 10: BARABBAS: What an epic story! This 1961 film stars Anthony Quinn as Barabbus, the criminal whom the Jewish mob spares and has Jesus crucified in his place. Based on the Gospels, the film traces the story of what might have happened to Barabbus after he was spared. Very dramatic crucifixion scene and riveting gladiator battles in an era before special effects. You’ll love the star-studded cast.

#9: SAVING GRACE. This is a little-known 1986 film that I found to be very entertaining. It stars Tom Conti as the newly-elected Pope Leo XIV. A strange thing happens to the fictional Pope: he accidentally gets locked out of the Vatican while he is out walking. He takes advantage of his “freedom” to embark on a heart-warming adventure in a small Italian village.

# 8: JESUS CHRIST SUPERSTAR, 30th ANNIVERSARY EDITION. Here’s the deal: this Broadway-based production by Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice is great theater and lousy theology. I didn’t like JCS until I saw the Des Moines Community Playhouse perform it in the late 90s, and then I was hooked. I later saw it at the Civic Center (which wasn’t as good as the Playhouse’s version.) I didn’t like the 1973 movie starring Ted Neely, but I loved the 2001 version that was broadcast on public television. I thought Jerome Pradon made a particularly compelling Judas. The Christian faith is a dramatic one. This version of JCS dramatizes Holy Week in a very entertaining and though-provoking way. It is a performance I watched with my kids on many occasions, and that counts for a lot.

#7: SHADOWLANDS: C.S. Lewis was one of the most influential men of the 20th century. His writings converted, and continue to convert, people to Christianity by the thousands, maybe even by the millions. What was he really like? Shadowlands tells the true story of his touching romance with American poet, Joy Gresham, who becomes his wife. The film deals with a difficult issue, terminal illness, a theme I usually avoid like the plague. Not this time. This is a beautiful film. Anthony Hopkins as Lewis and Debra Winger as Gresham are convincing as a couple. It was nominated for two Academy Awards including Ms. Winger for Best Actress.

#6: THE CHRONICLES of NARNIA: THE LION, WITCH, and the WARDROBE. C.S. Lewis wrote one of the most beloved set of children stories ever with the Chronicles of Narnia. This 2005 film is simply magical with Liam Neeson’s voice as Aslan the Christlike Lion. I went to the theater to watch it with my kids who ranged from their teens to the twenties at the time. This is a film that brings families together. It reaches across age barriers.

#5: THE PASSION of the CHRIST. This was more than a movie, it was an event that either united or divided people, much like Christ Himself. Mel Gibson’s movie was controversial. The violence is grotesque. It is not a fun movie to watch. I have seen it twice, and I will see it again … someday. Jim Caviezel was perfect as Jesus. The movie is important because it gives modern man an inkling of what Christ did for us. I heard Fr. John Riccardo once say about Christ’s cruxifixion: “If this is the cure, can you imagine the disease?” This movie forces us to think about that question seriously. The scene of Christ’s scourging is horrendous. Do you know why He was lashed 39 times? Because 40 was considered “death” by the Romans. It was unsurvivable. I would recommend the edited version with some of the violence excised. After watching this film, fall to your knees and thank Christ for what He did for us.

#4: THE TEN COMMANDMENTS: I never tire of seeing Charleston Heston playing Moses. This epic movie won four Oscars and dramatizes the life of one of the most important characters of the Old Testament. And what a cast!

#3: BEN-HUR: Mr. Heston returns in another epic story. This 1959 film won 11 Oscars. It tells the story of a Jewish prince sold into slavery by his Roman friend. His “comeback” leads him into the most famous chariot race scene ever made in the movies. Jesus’ appearance is brief and beautiful. Just writing this makes me want to run out and rent it!

#2: THE GOSPEL of JOHN: This is a unique film. It utilizes the exact text of the Gospel of John as it presents this beautiful slice of sacred scripture dramatically. Christopher Plummer’s narration is exquisite. Henry Ian Cusick makes a wonderful Jesus. I love this film and have seen it three times. In fact, I’ll watch it again in the next few weeks. This is what movie-making is all about, to take an important subject and present it beautifully, artistically, and theatrically while remaining true to the material. The Gospel of John does all of that and more. I love the way the Woman at the Well is handled. There are two versions: be sure to watch the long one, which is 3 hours. The two hour version leaves out too much.

#1: JESUS of NAZARETH. Nothing touches this film. It is the best Jesus film. It is the best Christian film. And it is the best religious film. Ever. Robert Powell is the best Jesus ever, even better than Jim Caviezel and Henry Ian Cusick. This film was a 382 minute mini series on television in 1977. Every single minute of this film is worth it. Nothing is wasted. Director Franco Zeffirelli has created an artistic masterpiece. He is true to the Gospels and creates an ancient Holy Land that seems real to modern man. His presentation of Jesus’ telling of the Prodigal Son is a work of genius, surely inspired by the Holy Spirit! Interestingly, one of the writers was Anthony Burgess, also the author of “A Clockwork Orange.” What a cast. Each star was at the top of their game. In addition to Mr. Powell, James Farantino was a Peter for the ages. Ian McShane was a complex Judas whose motivations are slowly revealed in his deft political maneuverings. Olivia Hussey as the Virgin Mary, and Anne Bancroft as Mary Magdalene both shine. The list is endless: Christopher Plummer fleshes out the human weakness of Herod Antipas. You can’t stand him in the end. And James Mason brings Joseph of Arimathea to life. The conversation he has with Jesus about the idea of being “born again” draws you irresistibly into the essence of the Gospels. That’s why this film is so good. You feel like you’re walking right alongside of Jesus. Everything seems so authentic.

Those are my picks. What are yours? Please let me know. I want to watch some great, new faith-filled films this Lent, starting this weekend. So let know your favorites right away!





Strong Republican debate tonight

22 02 2012

By Tom Quiner

Tonight’s debate was strong on substance. All four candidates made the Republican case and exposed the weakness of President Obama’s policies.

I think every single candidate came across well. Rick Santorum was in the crosshairs and had Mitt Romney and Ron Paul ganging up on him. Mr. Santorum kept his cool. He responded with clarity and intelligence. I was impressed. He knows his stuff. He did something else. He admitted he was wrong on “No Child Left Behind.” He explained why he voted the way he did, and it made sense. He explained why the vote was wrong in hindsight, and he made sense.

Newt Gingrich had a strong night, but that was because he wasn’t in the crosshairs. I don’t think Newt held up in the Florida debate when he was on hot seat as well as Rick Santorum did tonight.

Mr. Romney bothered me. He talked about how he supported the Catholic Church on life issues when he was Governor of Massachusetts, and yet when push came to shove back then he caved. Revisit a previous Quiner’s Diner post for details (“Mitt Romney’s less than resounding support for the unborn”).

I like the way Newt Gingrich turned around the question on birth control and asked “why didn’t the elite mainstream media ask Barack Obama why he supported infanticide when he was a state senator in Illinois?”

The media’s double standard is beyond debate. Rick Santorum has proven he can take the heat. He and Mr. Gingrich both made the conservative case well. So did Mitt Romney, you just never know if he really means it.

As for Ron Paul, his cavalier dismissal of Iran’s nuclear program suggests that Barack Obama is a better choice than he is.

 





Catholic Church doesn’t rely on opinion polls

22 02 2012

By John Rozycki

Regarding Peter Leo’s Feb. 14 essay, “Bishop Pates Misses the Mark on Contraception Rule”: He criticizes Bishop Richard Pates for defending the Catholic Church’s position regarding the contraceptive mandate from U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Unfortunately, Leo’s argument is based on his misunderstanding of the mandate’s financing and of the church.

With the administration’s recent “compromise,” Leo suggests that the responsibility of financing contraceptive coverage is shifted from religiously affiliated employers to insurance companies. Where will the insurance companies get the money? From people, including faithful Catholics.

Leo suggests that Pates “should reassess the collective conscience of Catholics on the issue of contraception before he speaks for them.” Furthermore, he suggests that DePaul University’s decision to provide contraceptive coverage “speaks volumes.”

In leading his flock, Pates relies on moral principles flowing from centuries of Catholic teaching. The church does not rely on opinion polls.

Leo clearly misunderstands the essence of the Catholic Church. The church is not limited to the clergy and staff; it is the whole universal community of believers.

Finally, Leo accuses Pates of being “shortsighted.” Really? The church has been in existence for over 2,000 years. It will prevail. Thank you, Bishop Pates.

[Thanks to Quiner's Diner reader, John Rozycki, for his contribution to the Diner.]





Obama’s war on Jefferson

21 02 2012

By Tom Quiner

Thomas Jefferson, founder of the Democratic Party

The founder of the Democratic Party, Thomas Jefferson, held a completely different view of America than the current leader of the party, Barack Obama.

Who is right?

Jefferson believed mankind enjoys inalienable rights that flow from God. Obama embraces secularism and believes the highest authority is the state.

Jefferson believed we each enjoy a right to life.

Obama’s belief in this right is conditional. The weakest in society, the preborn, have no rights and are subject to the whims of the powerful.

Jefferson believed we each enjoy a right to liberty. Obama doesn’t. He believes in fairness which calls on an elite power structure to determine who should get to keep the fruits of their own labor, and who would receive the fruits of another’s labor.

Jefferson believed we each have a right to a pursuit of happiness, which he defined as a right to accumulate and possess property. Obama believes the state should have a big say on this subject. Even more, happiness is a lifestyle issue in Mr. Obama’s eyes, not a property issue.

Here’s the thing: Republicans agreed with the Democrats of the Jefferson mindset. Sure they could wrangle over different issues, but they could compromise, too, because they all believed in these same fundamental American values as articulated by Thomas Jefferson.

Why are politics so polarized today? Because the current crop of Democrats think Mr. Jefferson was wrong.





Liberals, get used to it. Social conservatism is here to stay.

21 02 2012

By Tom Quiner

Social conservatism is growing because more people recognize the humanity of the preborn.

The Iowa poll reveals the unstoppable trend slowly sweeping the country: the percentage of Iowans who consider themselves pro life just went up another 2 points in the last year, from 52 to 54 percent.

Nationally, Rick Santorum is riding the wave. It is a dangerous place to be. The powers of the Left are setting their sites on him. They want to portray him as being nutty for caring so much about human life from the instant of conception.

And yet a growing percentage of America agrees, as Quiner’s Diner has discussed in the past week.

As a reflection of Iowan’s desire to protect human life, Republicans in the legislature are promoting a bill that would require physicians to  perform an ultrasound and share it with the mother before performing an abortion.

Planned Parenthood of Iowa is fighting it tooth and nail. They say the bill is “demeaning, badgering and manipulative.” What they don’t mention is that it is bad for their almighty profits. Here’s why: nine out of ten women who view the ultrasound of their child change their mind about aborting her.

They see a person, not a blob of cells. Nothing demeaning about that.

And no one is badgering this mother about the decision. Certainly not the doctor whose livelihood is dependent upon performing abortions. No, it is the mother’s own conscience that is doing the badgering. Her conscience screams: don’t do it! This is your daughter. You … we … can’t live with this decision. It will haunt us forever.

And how can a simple test that reveals the truth be manipulative? How many other surgeries ever take place without an x-ray or an ultrasound? Tell me, how many? Good grief, my dentist does an x-ray before filling one of my teeth.

If anything, it is manipulative on the part of Planned Parenthood to withhold such critical information.

A mother sees the beauty of life in a flash through the truth revealed by the ultrasound. It is truly love at first sight.

The president and his party have imposed abortifacients on religious organizations in violation of their religious rights.

Doesn’t it seem reasonable to impose a simple ultrasound on abortion mills in the name of the human rights of the little ones whose lives are on the line?





The employment rate is in devastating decline

20 02 2012

By Tom Quiner

The media correctly focuses on the unemployment rate, which has remained high since the economic downturn four years ago. Obamanomics hasn’t been able to mitigate the job carnage. The unemployment rate was  7.8% when Mr. Obama was sworn in, and came in at 8.3% last month.

Mr. Obama is touting the progress in recent months which has seen the rate drop from 9% a year ago to today’s still high rate.

The unemployment rate doesn’t count people who have given up finding a job and have simply dropped out of the job market. When those folks are counted, some economists suggest the real unemployment rate is closer to 15% to 20%.

There is another way to size up the difficult economic situation we’re in, and that is the employment rate, or in other words, the percentage of Americans in the workforce. The chart above clearly reveals the erosion since Mr. Obama’s medicine was administered to the U.S. economy.

Let us recap the medicine:

√ The $1.2 Trillion Stimulus (not billion, that’s Trillion with a capital “T”)

√ Cash for clunkers

√ Obamacare

√ Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

The good news is the recession ended. The bad news: it’s a jobless recovery. Oh, and our credit was downgraded, which costs the taxpayers more interest on the national debt.

Contrast the limpid recovery under Obamanomics compared to the robust one under Reaganomics (see previous post: “Is Obamanomics better than Reaganomics?”).

Mr. Obama needs to wake up. His way doesn’t work.

Simply look at the chart above.





Why Republicans should double-down on social issues

20 02 2012

By Tom Quiner

Jeffrey Bell

Jeffrey Bell, author of "The Case for Polarized Politics"

“Republicans need to focus on economic issues and downplay social ones.”

This is the sentiment of many Republicans. A former candidate for Governor here in Iowa said as much last year. Mitch Daniels, Governor of Indiana, said as much.

Evidence suggests they are wrong. Evidence, in fact, supports the contention that social issues are the ticket to the White House. So says Jeffrey Bell, author of “The Case for Polarized Politics.”

Mr. Bell points out that Republicans won but 2 out of 9 presidential contests between 1932 and 1964. Social issues weren’t on the American political landscape at that time.

Social issues arrived in 1968 and with it, a Republican resurgence. From 1968 on, Republicans won 7 out of 11 runs for the White House.Social issues are a political winner for Republicans

Mr. Bell identifies 31 states as being conservative states, representing 292 electoral votes (270 is all you need to win). Four more states are “conservativish” on social issues: Michigan, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, and Wisconsin.  Added into the mix, that represents a substantial 348 electoral votes.

Think about the past two Democrats who won the presidency. Bill Clinton and Barack Obama both downplayed their social liberalism. The media accommodated them, especially Mr. Obama, by downplaying the issue.

Bill Clinton was for capital punishment. He wanted to end welfare “as we know it.” He danced around the abortion issue by saying abortion should be legal, but rare. As president, he signed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

Although Mr. Obama gave us a glimpse of his radical perspective by touting the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA), the general public was by and large shielded from this left wing stance.

That has all changed.

Social issues become energized when one side is perceived as coercing the public. You know that old line liberals would use, “well you and I may not think it is okay, but I cannot impose my views on another woman.”

The public now sees clearly that is exactly what the radical left is doing to the rest of the country, and their leader is Barack Obama.

To recap, abortion loopholes permeate ObamaCare. Taxpayers are now paying for them.

Even more, Mr. Obama has violated the freedom of religion of faith-based organizations by requiring them to provide abortifacients (morning-after pills), sterilization, and contraception to their employees, services these organizations believe to be immoral. This was done by presidential fiat.

Even more, the president refuses to enforce the DOMA.

The president looks increasingly radical to a nation that is more conservative than liberal. He is increasingly being perceived as cramming his unsavory morality down our throats without using proper democratic channels.

All of this gives Rick Santorum an edge at this stage in the campaign. Mr. Santorum’s bonafide’s are beyond debate when it comes to discussing the economy or foreign policy. When it comes to social issues, no one can touch him.

If Republicans want to lose, they should downplay these social issues contends Jeffrey Bell.

If Republicans want to win, social issues should be a major piece of the debate along with critical issues of the economy.

These two issues go together. Team Obama is overreaching on both the size and scope of government as well as their desire to rewire the moral DNA of America.

This provides Republicans with a winning opportunity.





Why you need to know Fr. Frank Pavone

19 02 2012

By Tom Quiner

Like you, I have been the beneficiary of living at the same time as two extraordinary people.

I believe these two people will one day be identified as saints by the Catholic Church. I refer to the Blessed Pope John Paul II and Mother Teresa of Calcutta.

There is a man who walks among us that is not as well-known, but he is doing the work of a Saint right now in our midst. His name is Fr. Frank Pavone. He is the tireless director of Priests for Life. His group is at the forefront of fighting for an end to abortion and euthanasia.

If you read my previous blogpost on the president’s budget, you’ll note that I characterized Rep. Paul Ryan as the most-respected man in America when it comes to the budget. Well, Fr. Pavone may be the most-respected man in American when it comes to Life issues. He devotes his every waking hour to fighting this scourge.

He is fighting the Obama Mandate head on.

Fr. Pavone calls for peaceful civil disobedience.

Whether you’re a Baptist, Lutheran, Evangelical, Muslim, Jew, or Agnostic, you need to know this man and support him. He’s on the front lines of defending the First Amendment.

If you’re a person of faith, pray for Fr. Pavone and Priests for Life. They have powerful enemies. And take a few minutes to watch his video. He is calling us to action.





Obama: “I call for higher deficits forever.”

18 02 2012

By Tom Quiner

The president’s budget is out. Here is what he is saying:

“I have submitted a budget to Congress, and I call on them to approve it now without delay. I boldly and without apology call for more government spending and higher deficits as far as our accountants can see. I ask our Chinese friends to join us as partners in this endeavor by contining to lend us the money we desperately need to pay for our expanded entitlement spending once Obamacare is fully implemented. In return, they have offered us an advisory capacity on vexing foreign affairs. I continue to offer the American public my unique talents in managing America’s decline.”

Of course, the president didn’t actually say any of this. But if we cut through the fiscal manipulations presented by the president’s men, this is the true meaning of Barack Obama’s budget.

Last year’s budget was voted down by the Senate 97-0 (the same Senate, by the way, that hasn’t presented their own budget for over a 1000 days).

The president’s budget won’t fare any better this year because of its brazen irresponsibility. When asked point blank by Congressman Scott Garrett when the president’s budget comes into balance, the White House Budget Director, Jeffrey Zients dissembles.

He can’t answer the question, because the answer is never.

[Watch the 63 second clip above to see the White House Budget Director duck a simple question: what year will the president's budget come into balance?]





“If this is how we measure reality, heaven help us.”

18 02 2012

By Tom Quiner

The president has added $5 Trillion to the national debt.

The president’s new budget will add another $11 Trillion to the national debt, claims Republican Paul Ryan.

But the president claims his budget saves the U.S. $4 Trillion.

How do the president’s men explain away the gap? With smoke and mirrors, with a suspension of disbelief.

You and I are being subjected to a budgetary shell game.

Congressman Paul Ryan is perhaps the most-respected man in America in analyzing and shooting straight on the debt crisis facing this great nation.

We are in crisis. The president is doing nothing, absolutely nothing to repair the damage. In fact, he is making it worse with his cynical budget.

Watch Mr. Ryan systematically unravel the con job presented by Mr. Obama’s White House Budget Director, Jeffrey Zients.

Mr. Ryan expresses America’s frustration with Mr. Obama when he says, “if this is how we measure reality, heaven help us.”

You have a civic duty to watch this video.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 75 other followers