By Tom Quiner
It’s the biggest question of our life. Does God exist? If He does, it changes everything.
Some people drift away from a belief in God as they get older, just as some draw closer to Him. Why do some draw away from Him? I suppose there are many reasons. Here are a few:
1. Belief in God seems irrational (atheism).
2. God’s existence is unlikely (agnosticism).
4. Fear of accountability. If God is real, the way we live our life matters more than ever, and we may have to make changes in it.
Where do you fall?
Let me dwell on #1 for a minute.
God reveals Himself to us through reason, through the natural world. If you tend to be left-brained, that is, analytical and logical, you may find the “ontological” argument for God’s existence of interest. This approach uses reason and intuition alone to prove the existence of an all-powerful Creator.
The originator of this ontological argument is St. Anselm, the Archibishop of Cantebury in the 10th and 11th centuries. He was proclaimed a Doctor of the Church in 1720 by Pope Clement XI because of the significance of his contributions to the study of theology.
His unique argument follows. Dwell on it a few minutes:
- 1. That than which nothing greater can be thought can be thought.
- 2. If that than which nothing greater can be thought can be thought, it exists in reality.
- 3. Therefore, that than which nothing greater can be thought exists in reality.
Here is a paraphrased version of his argument from Wikipedia:
- 1. If I am thinking of the Greatest Being Thinkable, then I can think of no being greater.
- 1a. If it is false that I can think of no being greater, it is false I am thinking of the Greatest Being Thinkable.
- 2. Being is greater than not being.
- 3. If the being I am thinking of does not exist, then it is false that I can think of no being greater.
- 4. If the being I am thinking of does not exist, then it is false that I am thinking of the Greatest Being Thinkable.
Conclusion: If I am thinking of the Greatest Being Thinkable, then I am thinking of a being that exists.
An interesting philosophical puzzle, isn’t it? What do you think about St. Anselm’s proof?
Are there any flaws in his reasoning?