It is the Supreme Court’s decision that is irrational

“Although the policy arguments for extending marriage to same-sex couples may be compelling, the legal arguments for requiring such an extension are not. The fundamental right to marry does not include a right to make a State change its definition of marriage. And a State’s decision to maintain the meaning of marriage that has persisted in every culture throughout human history can hardly be called irrational.” CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS

2 Comments

  1. Jerry Lingle on June 27, 2015 at 4:25 pm

    If you had told me in 2008 that America would have National healthcare, Homosexual-marriage, decreed by Un-elected Judges by 2015–Insanity



    • quinersdiner on June 27, 2015 at 4:52 pm

      It’s easy when one gets over their love-affair with the Constitution.