Politically-correct capitalism is a loser 4


By Tom Quiner

I got an email from the Democratic Party yesterday.

They’re raising money in an attempt to overturn the stunning mandate won by Republicans in the election.

Here’s a flavor of their “love note”:

“What do Wilbur Ross and Steven Mnuchin — Trump’s incoming Secretaries of Commerce and the Treasury — have in common?

They’re both Wall Street billionaires who got rich preying on working Americans and foreclosing on their homes. And once confirmed, they plan to start bringing back the Bush-era economic policies that helped lead us to the worst economic recession since the Great Depression.”

They dost protest too much, methinks. The worst economic recession since the Great Depression was the fruit of a phenomenon known as ‘politically-correct capitalism,’ and they’re at least partially, if not largely, culpable.

For an analogy of the situation, let’s turn the clock back to an NFL game a few years ago when Donovan McNabb, was benched with two minutes left in the game.

If you’re not a football fan, stick with me. There’s a connection to this event and a larger American issue.

There were rumblings that then-Redskin coach, Mike Shanahan, was racist for benching the African-American McNabb.  I think not.

The National Football League (NFL) cares about one thing:  money.  The teams themselves, their coaches, their players, and their front offices care about two things: winning and money. I think winning even trumps money at the individual level in a professional sport like football where most of the players are already earning in excess of a million dollars a year.

The NFL believes in capitalism. They will pay more money to athletes who are the best to help them win more games.  It doesn’t matter if they’re white, black, purple, straight, or a thoroughly unpleasant guy like Colin Kaepernick, they will pay you a ton of money if you can help them win more games and make the playoffs.

In other words, the NFL believes in equality of opportunity rather than equality of outcome (redistribution).

Ultimately, it comes to this: the NFL makes economic decisions based on merit.

I refer to the NFL in light of the sharp economic downturn that afflicted America during most of the Obama years.  There are many causes for the downturn, which began in 2008. One of the causes is surely the impact of “politically-correct capitalism” on the mortgage industry, that is, the impact of economic decisions based on politics, not merit.

Community activist groups like ACORN successfully pressured Washington to relax “discriminatory” lending practices in the 1990s.  Our local paper, The Des Moines Register, ran dozens of stories in the 1980s about the practice of “redlining” where mortgage lenders would not lend money to people who lived in certain sections of town.

Lenders maintained they wouldn’t lend to people who were bad loan risks; activists claimed it was pure discrimination at work because so many of the folks not getting loans were bunched in the same neighborhoods.

So in 1992, new laws were passed directing new “affordable housing mandates” on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

When I purchased my first house in 1979, I had to have around 20 percent to put down on the house. According to the former Chief Credit Officer for Fannie Mae, Edward Pinto, HUD made it clear that more liberal lending policies were now required:

“Lending institutions, secondary market investors, mortgage insurers…..should work collaboratively to reduce homebuyer downpayment requirements.”

According to Peter Wallison of the American Enterprise Institute, by 2008 …

“almost 50% of loans…were subprime…and two thirds of them were held by government agencies or firms required to buy them by government regulations.”

By 2006, 30 percent of homebuyers were putting no money down.

These lax lending standards were specifically targeted to assist the African-American community in purchasing homes.  I believe the intent was honorable. Easier access to mortgages would increase the percentage of home ownership in America, and there is pride in ownership.

In my own marketing business, we began developing more marketing materials for mortgage companies throughout the country who touted nothing-down mortgages. Many mortgage brokers told me they didn’t need any marketing, because they had a backlog of clients standing in line waiting to borrow money with little down and low interest rates.

Of course you know what happened. The industry collapsed like a house of cards. And the very people we tried to help, the African-American community, suffered the most.

As African-American columnist Star Parker wrote:

“Black’s, whose home ownership rates skyrocketed during the government stoked boom, now have foreclosure rates twice that of whites. And, of course, black unemployment in this economic slowdown following the collapse is double that of whites.”

The desire to cheat the laws of supply and demand are irresistible. You know the mantra:

Let’s ratchet up the minimum wage and pay people what they need rather than what they’re worth.

Let’s liberalize lending laws and lend to people on the basis on what they desire rather than what they can afford.

It never works. As this blog has stated on more than one occasion, you end up hurting most the very people you’re trying to help the most.

What the politicians are really doing is making themselves feel good as they hurt good people through the mock benevolence of politically-correct capitalism.

The record speaks for itself. It’s time to take a lesson from the NFL. Let’s pay people what they’re worth. Let’s let people borrow money on their ability to repay.

Politically-correct capitalism has taken a deadly toll on America. The Democratic Party deserves blame, and even more, shame, for obscuring the root cause of the problem.

 

 

Advertisements

4 comments

  1. Good intentions (even noble intentions) must be subjected to critical thinking… and, in the end, the actual results produced. Half (my hyperbole) the programs generated by the government would be scrapped if measured by actual results. My considered opinion is that most government programs intended to help the poor are really middle-class jobs programs for government workers that produce little measurable results.

  2. Interesting how they have a problem w/ the way they view the method s these appointed fellows used to b/c rich. Did they forget hoe how “Pocahontas’, as Trump called her made $$ from the purchase of properties lost by Americans in the collapse after she was part of creating the legislation that made it possible for people to get home loans they really could not afford to repay? No wonder the DNC doesn’t use the elephant. Their memory is far too short.

  3. A nicely illustrated point.
    My sister the sister (Catholic nun) was arrested for a sit in advocating for a $15/hour minimum wage. Genuine (and False) compassion she has in abundance……Economic savvy, not so much!
    Besides, she is 80 years old……………..some people grow past the demonstration/arrest phase!
    I love her immensely!

    • She would not appreciate my take on the $15 minimum wage, namely that it is heartless and cruel by denying job access to young, untrained, minority workers. I believe in looking out for the little guy, something the minimum wage does not do.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s