More Facebook smugness 4


By Tom Quiner

As liberals so often do, Stephen Colbert sets up a false choice in the meme above.

A friend posted it on Facebook. Mr. Colbert suggests that if you don’t want to help the poor “without condition,” which to a liberal like Colbert means more welfare programs and more public spending without a speck of discernment as to whether it works or even has unwanted side-effects, then we are rejecting Jesus.

Interestingly, conservatives like to help the poor in a hands on way. They donate more money to charity than liberals and donate more time to the poor than liberals.

Liberals want to leave it up to the government, and demand that rich taxpayers foot the bill, you know, the same people who have already donated privately.

Here was my Facebook response:

I’m not sure where Mr. Colbert comes up with this stuff. The federal government operates over 90 means-tested welfare programs that provide cash, food, housing, medical care, and targeted services to poor and lower-income Americans.

Taxpayers pay out over a trillion dollars at the state and federal level to fund these programs, and yet the poverty rate today is comparable to the rate it was at when the Great Society Programs were passed in the 60s.

Honorable people can and should discuss these questions: 1. Is it working? 2. How can it work better? 3. Are the perverse incentives baked into the system responsible for dramatic spikes in the out-of-wedlock birthrates which drives so much of the social pathology in this country? Mr. Colbert’s smug meme sets back the conversation.

No one is suggesting that we don’t help the poor. Republicans want to move the poor from dependence to independence. Sadly, the Great Society programs created a permanent underclass dependent on Big Government from generation to generation.

Advertisements

4 comments

  1. What is this nonsense we dont “help the poor” in America? And I dont recall any call to help the poor w/o condition. As I read it, the wealthy were to leave a portion of the crop for the poor to glean and make their bread. It did not say to glean it, grind it, bake the bread, and deliver it to their door. Allowing the poor to work gave them SOME sense of self respect and worth. Most were embarrassed enough to just be gleaning on someone else’s property. People big on the massive welfare state dont read The Bible. They heard it said once to help the poor. They did not bother to read how God wanted it done. I believe I read some where that any that would not work should not eat. family was obligated to take care of the elderly and truly infirm. The old were not ashamed of their status. You took care of them as you knew one day others would you.The way of God is a beautiful circle that works so well. Tell me why we needed to get away from it again? Oh yeah, that awful thing called responsibility. I see lives being destroyed for unwillingness to assume responsibility for one’s self, let alone others. For all this personal freedom, it seems everyone is much more miserable.

      • Thanks! It was said all wisdom comes from God. It makes me wonder where the liberal gets their ideas. Well, no…I don’t wonder. I know where the ideas of socialism come from. They come from another source who fools the liberal into thinking they’re doing good while not bothering to see what God said on a topic. No true good EVER came from the minds of men.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s