Taking shots at St. Teresa of Calcutta 3

By Tom Quiner

Here is the response I received when I posted the meme above earlier today:

“There is something beautiful in seeing the poor accept their lot, to suffer it like Christ’s Passion. The world gains much from their suffering,” was her [Mother Teresa’s] reply to criticism. Nevertheless, when Mother Teresa required palliative care, she received it in a modern American hospital.

The comment comes from a Quiner’s Diner reader in Australia who, based on his previous posts, is an atheist.

The implication is that this new Catholic saint is a hypocrite.

Another atheist, the late Christian Hitchens, led the charge in trying to discredit Mother Teresa’s motives and her work in his documentary, “Hell’s Angel,” and in his book, “Missionary Position.” His work is the source material for much of the atheist rants against St. Teresa.

Is it true? Was Mother Teresa really the opportunistic phony portrayed by the faithless? I don’t think so. Interestingly, Mr. Hitchen never interviewed any of the poor people who were seemingly exploited by Mother Teresa.

However, there is no shortage of friends and associates with first-hand knowledge who come to her defense.

Gavin Chawla, who wrote a well-received biography of Mother Teresa in 1992, shed some light on the American hospital story. Evidently, she had an aversion to hospitals, but upon fainting on a trip to San Diego, aides rushed her to the hospital. Said Chawla:

“So strong was her dislike for expensive hospitals that she tried escaping from there at night. It’s completely unfair to accuse such a person of spending money on her treatment and not on those she cared so much for.”

Later, when she was seriously ill in Calcutta, she did receive medical care from American doctors, said Sunita Kumar, who worked with her for 36 years:

“I was quite heavily involved at the time when she was ill in Calcutta and doctors from San Diego and New York had come to see her out of their own will. Mother had no idea who was coming to treat her. It was so difficult to even convince her to go to the hospital. The fact that we forced her to, should not be held against her like this.”

As for the poor, Mother Teresa took care of people she found in the gutter that hospitals wouldn’t touch, as Chawla explains:

“Her intention was to take care of those who had fallen by the wayside; people whom no hospital would admit. She set up hospices and not hospitals because a hospital would have been good for just one city such as Calcutta. She wanted to care for the destitute all around the world.”

That’s why she is sometimes characterized as the ‘Saint of the Gutters.’

Fr. Peter Gumpel, an official at the Congregation for the Causes of Saints, labels claims that she rejected, neglected, or denied available medical or palliative care for the poor and terminally ill as “absolutely false. Beware of anecdotal stories circulating from disgruntled people or those with an anti-Catholic agenda.”

Susan Conroy worked side-by-side with Mother Teresa the last ten years of her life. She provides this first hand account of the saint’s work:

“When I read the criticisms of how the patients were cared for in the Home for the Dying, I kept thinking back to my personal experiences there . . . . I know how tenderly and carefully we tended to each of the destitute patients there—how we bathed them, and washed their beds, and fed them and gave them medicine. I know how the entire shelter was thoroughly and regularly cleaned from top to bottom, and each patient was bathed as often as necessary, even if it was multiple times a day…

They were considered “untouchables” of society, and yet there we were touching and caring for them as if they were royalty. We truly felt honored to serve them as best we could. Mother Teresa had taught us to care for each one with all the humility, respect, tenderness and love with which we would touch and serve Jesus Christ Himself—reminding us that “whatsoever we do to the least of our brothers,” we do unto Him.”

Mother Teresa of Calcutta: saint or hypocrite? You be the judge.


  1. I am honoured Tom, to be the inspiration for this posting. I must point out that I could furnish as many contrary accounts from many sources that contradict yours, however, that would turn this issue into a circular argument. I am a great believer that where there is smoke there is fire and let’s just say the Catholic Church comes second to none when it comes to protecting its own. Best wishes.

    • What intrigues me is this: there is no shortage of hypocrites on the scene deserving of being called out for being two faced. Hillary Clinton. Barack Obama. Fidel Castro. The list goes on. No person in my lifetime is less deserving than St. Teresa of Calcutta who got her hands dirty on a daily basis working with the least among us. Go figure.

      • There is another recent former American President that fits just as well in that list along with a British and an Australian Prime Minister, but let’s not go there.

        I do not deny Mother Teresa mixed with the poor and got her hands dirty including her inspiration taken on by humanitarian workers that was a positive of her life, but let’s put this in perspective and consider the hundreds of millions that disappeared into secret bank accounts and the lack of medical care that her patients suffered.

        I understand as a Catholic you would resist the idea that the sainthood was more than paid for, however it could be the obvious deduction.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s