By Tom Quiner
I bet you’re like me. You have friends, family, acquaintances with same-sex attractions.
You love them regardless.
You want them to be safe.
You want them to be happy.
For many people of faith, there’s more to it, though. They care about their soul. They worry that acting on same-sex impulses threatens their salvation.
You may agree or disagree.
But you can’t take away the legitimate concerns people with this faith belief hold.
Today, though, if you disagree with the idea of gay marriage, you are immediately labeled as being a “homophobe.”
You are publicly decried as being a human being who hates another, simply because you disagree with his/her political position on this issue.
The debate on same-sex attractions began evolving in the 90s. Then, the political call was for tolerance. Americans are very tolerant, very accepting of many things. Sometimes we’re slow to get it, but by and large, this has been a nation of great compassion.
So although Americans did not want the same-sex lifestyle to be woven into the fabric of our nation as a legitimate, alternative lifestyle, they took the stance that what goes on in the bedroom is private.
Times have changed.
Those who called for tolerance in the 90s had a different agenda. They really wanted acceptance of their lifestyle and political power.
They got it, and boy are they intolerant.
Ask Jerry Buell.
This former teacher of the year in Mount Dora, Florida, was temporarily suspended from his teaching duties at Mount Dora High School.
His offense? He made a politically incorrect post on his Facebook page as follows:
“I’m watching the news, eating dinner when the story about New York okaying same-sex unions came on and I almost threw up. And now they showed two guys kissing after their announcement. If they want to call it a union, go ahead. But don’t insult a man and woman’s marriage by throwing it in the same cesspool of whatever. God will not be mocked. When did this sin become acceptable?”
He added a second post a few minutes later:
“By the way, if one doesn’t like the most recently posted opinion based on biblical principles and God’s laws, then go ahead and unfriend me. I’ll miss you like I miss my kidney stone from 1994. And I will never accept it because God will never accept it. Romans chapter one.”
Free speech has been replaced by politically-correct speech in this new age of intolerance. Mr. Buell learned the hard way.
Intolerance has spread to the abortion debate.
How many times have you heard someone say, “although I’m personally against abortion, I don’t see how I can impose my will on someone else.”
Let me translate this “tolerant” view: “although I personally think that the object in the womb is a human being and that it would be infanticide to kill him or her, I don’t see how I can impose my opinion on someone else.”
This “tolerant” approach has led to an intolerance breathtaking in its brazenness.
Catholic doctors and hospitals that refuse to perform abortions are under attack. Pro-borts, with the financial backing of Planned Parenthood, are pulling out the stops to undo conscious-protections for people with ethical concerns about abortion.
Congress refused to omit abortion from Obamacare.
Here in Des Moines, Dr. Alveda King was disinvited from speaking at Roosevelt High School because a couple of parents didn’t like her politically-incorrect pro-life position.
There is no tolerance on the political Left when it comes to these issues.
How do we handle these issues? By making a case with unwavering intelligence, respect, and conviction.
The Catholic Church says it beautifully in its Catechism. They call for people with same-sex attractions to live chastely, and that they:
“… must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in this regard must be avoided.”
Jesus accepted people the way they were. But he called on them to change their lives.
And he called on us to love, or as Mother Teresa of Calcutta put it, to “love ’til it hurts.”