The selective application of human rights
By Tom Quiner
I could be looking at my grandson right now. He’s been in the womb for more than eight months.
Could someone please tell me why the person in the photo on the left is not entitled to human rights, but the one on right is?
Thank God my first grandchild is being born into a loving home with a loving mother and father, two dogs, not to mention four doting grandparents nearby.
There used to be a billboard down the road from me with a picture of a newborn baby and the caption, “Kill her today, it’s murder. Kill her a week ago, it’s abortion.”
There is no reasonable answer. Abortion is evil. Abortion practitioners (I would never honor them with the title Doctor) are the scum of the earth. Those who support murder for the unborn are either ignorant or they are evil. I would tell anyone in this forum that if you can view the unborn after they have been slaughtered and still support this horrific atrocity called the right to choose then you need a serious heart check.
HOW TRUE! It boggles my mind how (supposedly) otherwise sane, rational-thinking people can justify abortion when viewing an unborn baby’s face such as this!