Feminists want abortion language to include ‘transgender men’
By Tom Quiner
Michelle Goldberg is a senior contributing writer for The Nation.
She appeared on “All in With Chris Hayes” a few days ago. Of course, the show appeared on MSNBC.
She points out that the next politically-correct battle front is to expand language when discussing human abortion rights to include “transgender men.”
Her quote:
“Well, yeah, I mean, among young people, you know, I’ve had this conversation. I’ve written about this and they’re some conflicts especially within feminism over these issues.
So a lot of the younger feminists, for example at the abortions funds no longer want to use the word ‘woman’ in relation to abortion because it excludes trans men.”
Quiner’s Diner feels no further commentary is needed for such inanity, such drivel, such utter silliness, such liberalism run amuck.
Tom, just when you think the idiocy of some liberals couldn’t sink any further… I mean, does this woman truly believe that transgender men are actually capable of bearing children? Does she actually believe in her god, science, so much that she believes transplanting a womb from a woman to a man is possible? The scariest part about this is that there are young, impressionable feminists out there who are hearing this woman’s message and are buying into it, of course, without doing any actual research into the subject for themselves. And they themselves are possibly further spreading this utter nonsense among their crowd. And liberals have the audacity to call conservatives uneducated?
Steve, clearly, the idiocy CAN sink further. Logic and reason are ineffective in dealing with neo paganism.
I don’t mind leftists living in a fantasy world if they want to. What galls me is that they expect all the rest of us to play along with their delusions, and accuse us of hate crimes if we decline to do so.
Very well-stated. Always great to hear from you.