I also love how NOW everyone on the left is concerned about the possible appearance of improper relations and dealings…not when it was Arab $$$$ in a certain Sec. of State’s foundation. The idea that a man who builds a mammoth business empire legally is suspicious but a gvt employee can b/c worth 100’s of millions in a few years is two-faced to say the least. I’m STILL trying to figure out WHAT qualified a so-so one term senator to be Sec. of State anyway. Must be the association w/ a foundation that gvts can donate to.
I DO agree with you 100% on this comment. Like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton has had an affirmative-action career. She was not qualified to be a nominee, but Democrats thought it was time for a woman, no matter how corrupt she was.
Another Quiner forwardable!
Thank-you!
So spot on.
I also love how NOW everyone on the left is concerned about the possible appearance of improper relations and dealings…not when it was Arab $$$$ in a certain Sec. of State’s foundation. The idea that a man who builds a mammoth business empire legally is suspicious but a gvt employee can b/c worth 100’s of millions in a few years is two-faced to say the least. I’m STILL trying to figure out WHAT qualified a so-so one term senator to be Sec. of State anyway. Must be the association w/ a foundation that gvts can donate to.
I DO agree with you 100% on this comment. Like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton has had an affirmative-action career. She was not qualified to be a nominee, but Democrats thought it was time for a woman, no matter how corrupt she was.