Culture
The era of “psychological stupidity”
Camille Paglia is a lesbian feminist.
Pause.
How do you react to such a phrase?
Redundant? No, not fair. (The word feminist has different interpretations. A Catholic feminist, for example, will react to the term differently than a Marxist feminist.)
Liberal? Good guess.
Conservative? Unlikely.
Whatever moniker worn by Ms. Paglia, she is controversial. Some of her recent commentaries are sure to infuriate the Marxist/feminist crowd who tend to hate men and believe men can and should be altered by cultural elites, as Ms. Paglia relates in her Time Magazine essay today:
Read MoreThe cultural question of the day
Will you support my Kickstarter campaign?
By Tom Quiner Art is one of the best ways to evangelize our Christian faith. I have written a musical, The Wedding at Cana, that evangelizes the awe and beauty of the 2nd chapter of the Gospel of John using a dinner theater format. Would you check it out at my Kickstarter page? If the…
Read MoreThe Rube Goldberg approach to education
By Tom Quiner This is nuts.
Read MoreCommon sense says the abortion pill is unsafe
“It’s amazing the Register’s editorial staff can writeabout a teenager who ended up in the emergency room after taking abortion drugs (misoprostol) her mother ordered over the Internet and still insist this drug is safe.
Read More“Never give up on your dreams”
In a highly-charged political atmosphere where our president constantly pits one group against another, Apollos Hester is a breath of fresh air…
Read MoreThe case against human abortion
The “fake church” supported by the State
“What was once a request to live and let live has now become a demand for approval. The ‘ruling class,’ those who shape public opinion in politics, in education, in communications, in entertainment, is using the civil law to impose its own form of morality on everyone.”
Read MoreGlobal warming causes crime?
More intolerance from the Thought Police
[Advocates of gay marriage equate] “my opposition to a behavior as prejudice toward people who engage in that behavior. That’s the central fallacy in virtually every argument for homosexuality—if you don’t agree with homosexual behavior, you are somehow bigoted against people who want to engage in that behavior. How does that follow? If conservatives and Christians are “bigots” for opposing homosexual behavior, then why aren’t homosexual activists bigots for opposing Christian behavior? And if we are bigots for opposing same-sex marriage, then why aren’t homosexual activists bigots for opposing polygamous or incestuous marriage?”
Read More