By Tom Quiner

Every single person who has heard the name “Jesus” has to make a leap of faith today.
Their leap has three possibilities, as the great Christian apologist, C.S. Lews pointed out.
They need to make the leap that Jesus was a lunatic.
Or they can make the leap that Jesus was a liar.
Or they can make the leap that He is Lord.
Those seem to be the options.
Based on the historical record,  it seems unlikely that Jesus was a nutcase or a con man. Christianity  calls for us to use both faith and reason in accepting Christ’s claims of Lordship, and resurrection. Reason alone can take us a long way in discovering God and His Son. Faith takes us the final way.
It works two ways.
Just as the believer has faith in the historical record, the non-believer has to have faith that this record is wrong. One reader of this blog went so far as to claim:

“There’s practically no historical evidence for the crucifixion. What are you talking about?”

In other words, they’re not even willing to consider Christ’s resurrection until we resolve if Jesus was even crucified in the first place.
The New Testament is loaded with evidence.
The apostle Matthew is believed to have written his gospel 17 to 37 years after the crucifixion of Jesus. He corroborates the accounts of the crucifixion.
Mark the Evangelist wrote his gospel about 22 to 37 years after Jesus was crucified. Mark was a traveling companion of Peter and corroborates the accounts of the crucifixion.
Luke was a traveling companion of Paul and would have known Jesus’ disciples. His gospel is believed to have been written no more than 29 years after Jesus’ crucifixion and corroborates the accounts of the crucifixion.
John was another apostle and eyewitness to the crucifixion. His gospel was written some fifty to sixty years after Jesus’ crucifixion and corroborates the accounts of the crucifixion.
Paul is an interesting historian when it comes to Jesus’ crucifixion. He was a former enemy of Christianity who underwent a mystical conversion and became a Christian himself. He spent the rest of his life spreading the message that Jesus is Lord. He wrote a series of thirteen epistles some 18 to 25 years after the crucifixion, again testifying to the veracity of the events.
Interestingly, when you look at other major figures in the ancient past, their histories were written much later than the accounts written about Jesus.
For example, the earliest surviving histories of Alexander the Great were written 300 to 500 years after he died.
The earliest surviving histories of Buddha were written some 600 years following his death.
The accounts of the life of Jesus of Nazareth were written within a generation of his life when there were eye witnesses to corroborate … or refute … the testimony of the authors.
Detractors dismiss biblical accounts as being all about religion and lacking historical objectivity. Nonetheless, non-biblical sources confirm the life and death of Jesus, such as Jewish historian, Flavius Josephus:

Jewish historian, Flavius Josephus


“At this time there was a wise man who was called Jesus. And his conduct was good, and [he] was known to be virtuous. And many people from among the Jews and the other nations became his disciples. Pilate condemned him to be crucified and to die. And those who had become his disciples did not abandon his discipleship. They reported that he had appeared to them three days after his crucifixion and that he was alive.”

Roman Senator, Cornelius Tacitus, also referenced the early Christians and Jesus:

“Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the

Roman Senator and Historian, Cornelius Tacitus


most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilate, and a most mischievous superstition thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome.”

The Greek satirist, Lucian, acknowledged the life and death of Jesus:

Greek satirist, Lucian


“The Christians, you know, worship a man to this day – the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account…”

Few critics deny that Jesus existed or was crucified by the Romans. Biblical and non-biblical evidence is compelling in this regard.
Today, each of us has to make a leap of faith. Is Jesus a lunatic, liar, or Lord?
The evidence is compelling: Lord!
Alleluia! He has risen!
 

No Comments

  1. Thomas J. Maly on April 20, 2014 at 4:39 pm

    AMEN!

  2. […] The Easter leap of faith « A Heapin’ Plate of Conservative Politics & Religion. […]

  3. Charlene on April 21, 2014 at 3:11 pm

    I am glad to see that more of us Christians are adopting apologetics rather than telling non-believers, “God said it, so I believe it.” Faith isn’t without reason – it wouldn’t be Truth if there wasn’t supporting evidence (and a lot of it!) for it. The answers about the authenticity and authority of the Bible are all there – one simply needs to look past his own biases to see them.

    • quinersdiner on April 21, 2014 at 3:42 pm

      Yes, well said. Faith and reasons are allies, not adversaries. In order to grasp reality and truth, we need to rely on a blend of science, philosophy, and theology. Evangelical atheists want to rely exclusively on science at the expense of philosophy and theology. Christians embrace all three. The world has been blessed by having two recent Popes who excelled in philosophy (Pope John Paul II) and theology (Pope Benedict XVI). In their wisdom, they have provided lots of food for thought for all, regardless of religious affiliation. Thanks for writing, please come again.

Leave a Comment