More dishonesty from the Obama administration?

By Tom Quiner

Barack Obama infamously dismissed ISIS as the ‘jayvee team.’

This is the same jayvee team that has commandeered a big chunk of Iraq.

This is the same jayvee team that has raped, beheaded, and mutilated thousands of innocents, regardless of age.

This is the same jayvee team that is scrubbing the Mideast of any vestige of Christianity.

So how are things going against these “punks?” Swimmingly, if you listen to the president’s men. Terrible, if you listen to the guys on the ground. Fifty of our spies were so distraught over the sugar-coated reports coming out of the administration that went public to to pull back the curtain.

Reporters for the liberal Daily Beast said the following:

It’s being called a ‘revolt’ by intelligence pros who are paid to give their honest assessment of the ISIS war—but are instead seeing their reports turned into happy talk.

More than 50 intelligence analysts working out of the U.S. military’s Central Command have formally complained that their reports on ISIS and al Qaeda’s branch in Syria were being inappropriately altered by senior officials, The Daily Beast has learned.

The complaints spurred the Pentagon’s inspector general to open an investigation into the alleged manipulation of intelligence. The fact that so many people complained suggests there are deep-rooted, systemic problems in how the U.S. military command charged with the war against the self-proclaimed Islamic State assesses intelligence.

“The cancer was within the senior level of the intelligence command,” one defense official said.

One person who knows the contents of the complaint said it used the word “Stalinist” to describe the tone set by officials overseeing the military’s analysis.

Stalinist.

Sounds like a certain president we know. This guy knows how to pay hardball against conservatives and the American people, but he’s a softie when it comes to dealing with Putins, Castros, Ayatollahs, and Islamic terrorists.

Sadly, it is far too easy to believe that our very own president’s men are cooking the books on intelligence reports to delude the American people into thinking that everything is hunky-dory in the Mideast.

Despite all the faux-rosy reports, only 25% of Americans support our deal with Iran. That’s less than supported Obamacare, as Dan Henninger pointed out in this morning’s Wall Street Journal.

Like Obamacare, the Iran deal is built on deceit. Like so much of Obama’s prescriptions for America and the world, it will be imposed on us without going through proper democratic channels.

 

3 Comments

  1. encourage the faithful on September 11, 2015 at 12:50 pm

    Lies, lies and more lies and deceit from that devil’s spawn (ouch! I know it is a strong denunciation) and his minions. Never, in the history of our country has there been such rabid evil. Bill Clinton’s administration fails to compare (even as he corrupted the body at least he had respect for the rule of law and his country). Something insidious, evil, and devious has plotted and continues to plot, these past seven years, to rip apart humanity and destroy everything we hold dear. As I see it Tom, Obama is leaving no opportunity for repair. This administration has taken all the ill-gotten “gains” from past administrations, put them together and sold this country to Iran (where Valerie Jarrett was born, by the way), Islam and the devil.



    • quinersdiner on September 11, 2015 at 1:07 pm

      You’re right, so much will be difficult to repair in terms of moral issues and foreign policy issues. Economical repairs are feasible and likely with Republicans. The moral repairs will have to come from the Church and the faithful standing up the Truth. In other words, we need more Kim Davis’s.



  2. stevegreer1 on September 12, 2015 at 8:53 am

    Things that make you go, hmmmm? I saw two different articles today: One was about Putin sending troops into Syria to help Assad fight ISIS. The other one was about Obama “warning” Putin not to get involved in Syria. Another red line in the sand? Let me type the comparison again… one was about Putin sending troops into Syria to aid Assad in a fight against ISIS, one was about Obama warning Putin not to get involved in Syria.

    Wait, I thought ISIS was the enemy? Am I missing something here? It seems his JV team is getting out of hand and we should gladly embrace help from another country. The U.S. can’t fight every war by itself. But no, I don’t believe that to be the case. Obama wants a destabilized Middle East. He wants ISIS to go on a rampage and cause death and destruction (especially when it involves the ever shrinking Christian population) while at the same time handing Iran the sweetest deal possible. I believe encourage the faithful’s last sentence above summed it all up.