How to change the world with lies

By Tom Quiner

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxOWyumLufA&feature=player_embedded&utm_source=Live+Action&utm_campaign=24dc750162-04-12+Meat+Market&utm_medium=email]

I have lived through a social revolution built on lies.

Roe v. Wade came down from on high when I was in college. The ruling hinged on a simple question: was the fetus a person or not? The Supreme Court decided the answer was no.

The Court had been influenced very much by a fledgling abortion lobby led by Dr. Bernard Nathanson, who was a leader in the so-called abortion “rights” movement, and was instrumental in establishing the National Abortion Rights Action League, now known as NARAL.

After performing some 60,000 abortions thanks to the Roe ruling, Dr. Nathanson had a wrenching change of heart when he realized the fetus felt pain when it was killed.

He became a pro life advocate who admitted how successfully they duped the media, the politicians, and rank and file Americans:

“We fed the public a line of deceit, dishonesty, a fabrication of statistics and figures. We succeeded because the time was right and the news media cooperated. We sensationalized the effects of illegal abortions, and fabricated polls which indicated that 85 percent of the public favored unrestricted abortion, when we knew it was only 5 percent. We unashamedly lied, and yet our statements were quoted [by the media] as though they had been written in law.”

Today, a trial rages in Philadelphia. Dr. Kermit Gosnell is accused of murdering post-abortive babies countless times. These were babies intended for abortion. Dr. Gosnell delivered them alive and then killed them in the most gruesome fashion.

Human abortion advocates yawned about the trial and dismiss Dr. Gosnell as an aberration. But he’s not.

Pro life investigative reporters, Live Action Films, went undercover. They sent a pregnant woman into a prominent Washington D.C. late term abortion clinic.

She asked the human abortionist what would happen if the baby somehow survived an abortion attempt. Remember, by law, the abortionist would be required to provide medical care. But here is what he said:

“Technically – you know, legally we would be obligated to help it, you know, to survive. But, you know, it probably wouldn’t. It’s all in how vigorously you do things to help a fetus survive at this point. Let’s say you went into labor, the membranes ruptured, and you delivered before we got to the termination part of the procedure here, you know? Then we would do things –we would – we would not help it. We wouldn’t intubate. It would be, you know, uh, a person, a terminal person in the hospital, let’s say, that had cancer, you know? You wouldn’t do any extra procedures to help that person survive. Like ‘do not resuscitate’ orders. We would do the same things here.”

Translation: we’d let the kid die.

Watch the video above to expose the lie that babies aren’t left to die on the slab after surviving an abortion. How often does this happen?

Who knows?

The human abortionists in this country don’t really like to admit they botched an abortion and the patient lived, do they?

Since federal law is on the line, don’t you think we need a Congressional investigation to discover how often Born Alive laws are being violated?

Let’s shift gears to another front in the culture wars: gay marriage. Gay marriage advocates, the president, his party and rank and file liberals insist that redefining marriage will have no effect on traditional one man/one woman marriage. Writer and gay activist, Masha Greene openly admits this is all a smokescreen, all a lie (her word):

“It’s a no-brainer that (homosexual activists) should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist. …(F)ighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there — because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie.”

It is so refreshing when a liberal is honest about lying. Ms. Greene, who is a lesbian, says the intent of gay marriage is to destroy marriage:

“The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don’t think it should exist. And I don’t like taking part in creating fictions about my life. That’s sort of not what I had in mind when I came out thirty years ago.”

She disdains the idea of an intact traditional family with two parents:

“I have three kids who have five parents, more or less, and I don’t see why they shouldn’t have five parents legally… I met my new partner, and she had just had a baby, and that baby’s biological father is my brother, and my daughter’s biological father is a man who lives in Russia, and my adopted son also considers him his father. So the five parents break down into two groups of three… And really, I would like to live in a legal system that is capable of reflecting that reality, and I don’t think that’s compatible with the institution of marriage.”

The human abortion and gay marriage movements are built on lies. The lies are obvious. People in these movements have admitted they are lying.

But a lot of folks want to believe the lies.

Do you know who the people are being crushed by these lies? Babies and children.

Are you okay with this?