PBS’s Gwen Ifill doesn’t understand patriots’ rage regarding Benghazi

By Tom Quiner


Gwen Ifill

Gwen Ifill said she doesn’t understand the depth of anti-Hillary conservative rage regarding Benghazi.

To her, evidently, Hillary’s involvement was that of a dispassionate bystander.

I turned over to PBS tonight during the Republican Convention to get a flavor of their reporting. Ms. Ifill and her panel were clueless on the significance of Benghazi.

To them, our ambassador’s plea for more security wasn’t a big deal.

Our government’s decision not to send in troops to protect our guy’s from getting butchered was no big deal.

To them, Hillary’s decision to blame an American film maker, knowing it was a lie, was no big deal.

I forgot how biased PBS can be.

A patriot can’t help but to be revolted considering Hillary Clinton’s handling of Benghazi.

Gwen Ifill and her PBS team view Benghazi as a non-issue.


  1. Dennis Wagoner on July 18, 2016 at 8:01 pm

    We have had PBS on for 45 minutes and have not yet seen any of the convention, just the PBS folks trashing Trump and Republicans in general.

  2. Tom Maly on July 18, 2016 at 8:24 pm

    You don’t Ever put Americans in that precarious a situation lacking adequate security and you sure as H_____ (heaven!!!) don’t EVER abandon them without sending whoever/whatever you can to save them while they are under fire!

  3. parrillaturi on July 19, 2016 at 10:38 am

    That’s the way she has always been. It doesn’t matter who gets hurt, so long as her agenda comes first.

  4. Anonymous on July 20, 2016 at 8:19 pm

    Agree completely, PBS panel has absolutely no one sitting on it that is not a nauseatingly biased hack. And the coverage of the actual speakers and their speaking has been been non existent all night tonight, Wednesday,…I am furious that PBS can delivery this kind of a totals smear campaign
    and be given taxpayer money. They need to be defunded.

    • quinersdiner on July 20, 2016 at 9:30 pm

      I haven’t been watching tonight, and I try to avoid PBS on this type of coverage.

  5. Lori on July 20, 2016 at 10:06 pm

    I’ve been questioning the use of public money for PBS for years.